General provisions

Works (articles, monographs, reviews, lectures) that have not been published earlier and are not under consideration for publication in other printed publications are sent to the journal «Medicine and high technologies». The manuscript can be submitted in Russian and English (for foreign authors) languages. Manuscripts must not contain factual errors. The editors reserve the right to correct manuscripts and point out factual errors in them, as well as to subject stylistic corrections and shorten lengthy articles. Responsibility for the accuracy of the information and the originality of the submitted materials rests with the authors. Submitted papers will not be returned. After publication, all copyrights belong to the editors. Refusal of publication may not be accompanied by an explanation of its reason and cannot be considered a negative conclusion about the scientific and practical value of the work.

Conflict of interests

When submitting a manuscript, the authors are responsible for disclosing their financial and other conflicting interests that could influence their work. All significant conflicts of interest should be reflected in the manuscript (in a footnote on the first page). If sponsors are available, authors should indicate their role in designing the study, collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data, and in deciding whether to publish the results. If funding sources were not involved in such activities, this should also be noted.

Article Submission Requirements

The work must be presented in two copies in printed form and signed by all authors. On a separate sheet, the full name, academic titles, address, place of work and position of each of the authors, as well as the contact phone number and e-mail address of one of the authors should be indicated. By submitting the work to the editorial office in printed form or on digital media, the authors agree that their contact numbers, email addresses, place of work, address of the place of work and position in accordance with the requirements of the Higher Attestation Commission for peer-reviewed scientific journals, will be indicated in the journal and its internet version. In addition to the printed version, the material must be submitted on electronic media or sent by e-mail.

Authors can specify one of the following types of publications for their material:
Original research — completed scientific papers containing a summary of the state of the issue under consideration and the statement of the problem to be solved in the article; materials and methods for solving the problem and the assumptions made; research results; discussion of the results obtained and their comparison with previously known data; conclusions and recommendations. In original articles, it is necessary to indicate in which of the stages of creating the article each of the authors took part: the concept and design of the study; collection and processing of material; statistical data processing; writing text; editing. The review is a detailed analysis of the current state of topical problems based on the materials of the scientific press.
New methods — a detailed description of the original methodological approaches to diagnosis and therapy; hardware and software.

Text formatting requirements

The procedure for reviewing articles sent to the editors of the peer-reviewed publication

The publication reviews all the materials received by the editorial office that correspond to its subject, with the aim of their expert evaluation. All reviewers are recognized experts in the subject of the peer-reviewed materials and have publications on the subject of the peer-reviewed article over the past 3 years. Reviews are stored in the publishing house and in the editorial office of the publication for 5 years.

Each article submitted for publication in the journal «Medicine and High Technologies» is sent for review.
Reviewing of articles is double-blind (anonymous), that is, the names of the authors of the manuscript of the article are unknown to the reviewer, and the names of the reviewers are also not reported to the author.
The executive secretary, within one day after the adoption of the article, transfers it to the deputy. editor in the relevant direction for the appointment of reviewers. The reviewers are specialists who have a Ph.D. or Doctor of Science degree in the relevant field of knowledge. Members of the Editorial Board can act as reviewers, provided that they and the author are not employees of the same organization.
The reviewer within 3 weeks submits a review (in the form) in electronic form to the executive secretary of the editorial board at v_m_gukasov@mail.ru.
The reviewer can recommend the article for publication; recommend for publication after revision, taking into account the comments; do not recommend the article for publication. If the reviewer recommends the article for publication after revision, taking into account the comments, or does not recommend the article for publication, the reasons for such a decision should be indicated in the review.
If the article is recommended for publication after revision, taking into account the comments, the executive secretary sends a review for revision to the author.
After re-receiving the article (corrections by the author of the comments), the executive secretary transfers the manuscript to the same reviewer for re-reviewing.
In case of rejection of the material, the responsible secretary sends a review to the author by e-mail, indicating the possibility of sending the article for re-reviewing at the request of the author. The name of the reviewer can be communicated to the author only with the written consent of the reviewer.
In case of repeated rejection of the article, the executive secretary sends a review to the author by e-mail. More than two times the article is not sent for review.
After reviewing, the article is submitted for technical editing. The technical editor may reject the article and send it to the authors for revision because the article does not meet the formal requirements. Also, the article may be rejected by the editor-in-chief / editor in the direction — due to disagreement with the results of the review, the identification of a conflict of interest, violation of ethics.
Common reasons for publication rejection:

• the article is poorly or incorrectly structured;
• the article is not detailed enough for readers to fully understand the analysis proposed by the authors;
• the article has no scientific novelty;
• the article has an insufficient number of relevant links;
• the article contains theories, concepts, or conclusions that are not fully supported by data, arguments, or information;
• the article does not provide a sufficiently detailed description of the methods and materials that would allow other scientists to repeat the experiment;
• there are no clear descriptions or explanations in the article: tested hypotheses, description of experiments, examples of statistical or experimental samples;
• the article describes the conduct of experiments poorly, or mistakes are made, or statistical analysis is not provided;
• the quality of the language does not meet the requirements of a scientific article;
• the article contains unreasonable criticism of the existing fundamental provisions, generally accepted theories and facts;

• the article has a pronounced political character, contains provisions and appeals that are incompatible with generally accepted norms. The editorial board of the publication sends copies of reviews or a reasoned refusal to the authors of the submitted materials, and also undertakes to send copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation upon receipt of a corresponding request by the editorial

Articles should be sent to the email address: infsvz@gmail.com